Dalkey in the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries

The nucleated settlement that grew up at Dalkey in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries was linear in shape with one main street running east-west. The modern street is about 300 metres long. It widens into a rough triangle at the eastern end; this may have been the site of the medieval market place. When the street left the town at the west end it became the road to Monkstown and Dublin. There were almost certainly laneways or tracks off the main street but all the existing side roads are modern. There must have been a track or causeway to the seashore, possibly to the present day Coliemore harbour or close by. One or two lanes went to Bullock. It was a separate village, the property of St. Mary's Abbey and part of its manor of Monkstown, little is known about its relations with Dalkey in the medieval period.

 

St. Begnet's Church is situated on the north side of the main street, Castle Street. It is surrounded by its churchyard, in which interments were made sporadically until the 1920's. The boundary walls are modern but the bulk of the surviving structure is Anglo-Norman.The chancel appears to have been added to a Celtic nave. The east and west windows, the belfry and, possibly, some of the entrances and other pieces of the fabric are late medieval, fifteenth or sixteenth century work. This would coincide with Dalkey's period of prosperity. The building seems to have survived into the seventeenth century but was described in Bulkeley's visitation of 1630 as ruinous with no roof on the chancel.

 

The burgage plots may have lined both sides of the main street but there is some indication that at least one may have been parallel. They were mostly long and narrow because the site was constricted by the high rocky ground to north and south. The fields were immediately behind the burgages but the arable also extended well to the west of the town. Cottages and cabins, the dwellings of the cottiers and tenants, were interspersed among the burgages. Outside the town the commons stretched in an arc to the south and east and provided communal grazing. Peter Wilson wrote in 1768 "although this common is remarkably rocky, it nevertheless affords most excellent pasture for sheep. Here the poorer inhabitants of the town graze their cattle.

 

Firm evidence for fortifications emerges only in the late fifteenth century. The 1482 grant of fair and market, referred to earlier, provided that the customs to be levied by the bailiff of all things and merchandises coming for sale" were to be spent on the murage and pavage of the town. There has been some suggestion that this grant was not for the benefit of Dalkey but concerned the collection of Dublin murage there. It is clear from the text of the grant, as recorded by Alen, that it related to Dalkey. In fact, it included a saver for the rights of Dublin and Drogheda. It is, indeed, hard to imagine the archbishop petitioning for a grant to benefit Dublin. Also, the date coincides with Dalkey's period of prosperity. Wilson said the town was defended on the south by a moat or ditch, which was still open. He added that the entrance to the west was through a gateway secured by two castles of which few or no traces remained. He thought the east side had also been walled. Brooking's map of the bay and harbour of Dublin, published 1728, shows Dalkey as a fortified ring, perhaps intended to indicate walls. But this may be a flight of fancy on the mapmaker's part. The walls were gone by 1770 but there may have been slight remains of the west gate.

 

It is very difficult to discern any remains of the defences due to extensive building and, possibly, the construction of the railway. Bradley suggested, not unreasonably, that the southern rampart was co-terminous with the boundaries of the burgage plots on the south side of Castle Street. He identified a much eroded earthwork in that area. The bank is three metres high and the top is on average two metres above internal ground level. The external fosse has silted up. It is very unlikely that there stone walls which were expensive and would have been beyond the economic and manpower resources of the town. The defences would have comprised an earthen rampart, probably topped with loose rocks, and a double ditch, now filled in. There is nothing to support the idea of an earthwork on the north and, as it

faced the sea and the ground was very hilly and rocky, it is quite likely that there was nothing on .that side. The existence of east and west gates predicates some form of walling on those sides, perhaps more rudimentary than the southern rampart and not extending very far in a northerly direction.

 

There is documentary evidence for the gates. In 1565 a demise of lands to one Henry Walsh included "one cottage place or void messuage in Dalkey by the east gate of the same." This gate was probably at the end of Castle Street opposite the present Allied Irish Bank building. The conjectured market place would have been just inside the gate. In 1577 a demise to Alderman Walter Ball (which could be the same land) also mentions the east gate. The indications are that the west gate was at the junction of Barnhill Road (the old road to Dublin) and Dalkey Avenue. The road is extremely narrow at this point. All that can be said with certainty about fortifications is that there was an embankment and ditch on the south side and that there were east and west gates.

 

There are reputed to have been seven castles, in reality fortified town houses, in Dalkey but at best only six have been identified. Bullock castle has been suggested as the seventh but that seems improbable. Wilson, writing in 1768, mentioned seven. He described six and the seventh had been demolished some years previously. Lewis found three in use in 1837, one as a private house, the other two as a store and a carpenter's shop. The 1843 Ordnance Survey 6 inch sheet (surveyed 1837) shows five, one to the east of the ruined church, which is clearly the Goat Castle, the present Town Hall, another site further east, a castle and a site to the west of the church and a castle on the south side of Castle Street, which is Archibold,s Castle. Two survive, the Town Hall and Archibold's.

 

Documentary evidence for the castles is fairly good from the sixteenth century. In 1585 John Dungan, second remembrancer of the exchequer, was demised a moiety of one messuage with a castle, half an orchard and two acres of land for sixty-one years at a rental of seven shillings Irish. He was required to build up the premises, indicating that the town was in decline and the castles were deteriorating. A James Kennan got a lease of the same property for twenty-one years in 1645 at thirty shillings sterling, this lease shows the castle was on the south side of Castle Street and can reasonably be assumed to be the one now known as Archbold's Castle. The Dungans got it back at the Restoration but lost it again in the Williamite confiscations. An inquisition of 9 March 1691 stated that William Dungan, earl of Limerick, was seized of two castles, six messuages and gardens, seven acres of arable land together with meadow and pasture (seventy-four acres in total) in Dalkey. The second castle was probably on the north side of the street, where there is reasonable evidence for a Dungan's castle.

 

An inquisition post mortem taken in 1594 showed that Henry Walshe of Killincarrig, who had died in 1570, had two castles and 75.5 acres in Dalkey, which he held of the archbishop. Another inquisition in the following year showed Robert Barnwell held another in Dalkey of the archbishop; this was described as ruinous in 1628. The fate of these Walshe and Barnwell properties in the Cromwellian and Restoration settlements is somewhat difficult to elucidate but James, duke of York (later James 11) got extensive properties at the Restoration. In 1703 John Allen of Stillorgan purchased nineteen acres in Dalkey with four castles thereon and several cabins formerly the property of King James, all for 151. Thus Dungan's two and King James's four show at least six castles in existence at the end of the seventeenth century. There was a local tradition that the seventh castle was on the south side of the street to the east of Archibold's. Some worked pieces of stone in the granite boundary walls in that area suggest that the possibility should not be ruled out.

 

The castles built in Dalkey were fortified town houses of the late medieval period. Similar buildings have been found in places as diverse as Cork, Dingle, Dundalk, Caarlingford, Ardglass, Ardee, Termonfeckin, Newcastle Lyons, Naas and Thomastown. The Dalkey examples appear to be somewhat smaller than the norm, which may reflect smaller sites, and they were less ornamented. The builders are unknown. They were used primarily for storage and defence. Such buildings could also indicate wealth and prestige. The only families recorded as being associated with them date from the late sixteenth century. John Dungan was a merchant and government office-holder and the Barnwalls and Walshes were local gentry. While the majority of the inhabitants of Dalkey lived in much more modest dwellings, the range of fortified town houses provides material evidence of the period of prosperity enjoyed by Dalkey in the fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries.

 

INTRODUCTION

 

In the account of Master Thomas de Chaddisworth, custodian of the temporalities of the diocese of Dublin from 1272 to 1279, the first entry under Shankill was "of the rents of the freeholders, betaghs and cottagers of the manor of Senekill, Killmacbeirne and Dalkey, members of the same manor for the same period. Ideally, one should describe how those classes lived and worked together, how they organised their town and how they related to their neighbours, settler and Irish, and to the wider world of Dublin city, as well as to England and the other lands, whence came the ships that anchored in the Sound. This is not possible on the basis of the surviving material. The information presented in this chapter relates, in the main, to property holdings. There is a little on crime and justice and only tantalising glimpses of lesser people renting cottages and a few acres and living by agriculture and fishing. Much of the evidence is late but it is sufficient to show that the dominant interests in the town were the Dublin merchants and local landowners.

 

Property holders

 

The feoffees, or large freeholders were mainly in the hill country and their task, obviously, was to guard the march and to act as the first line of defence against the native Irish. Reginald de Barnevalle (Barnwall), for example, was recorded in the extent of 1326 as holding two carucates (a carucates in the Dublin region was usually 120 acres) in Stagonil. He also had lands in Terenure. Barnwalls were important landholders in Shankill and Dalkey in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. William of Finglas was another individual with lands in Shankill and elsewhere; a person of that name was recorded in the extent of 1326 as having estates in Finglas.

 

One cannot assert with any confidence that any of the persons named in the 1326 extent were associated with Dalkey town although some of the names are found there in later centuries. Dawe may be an exception. John Dawe was listed as a juror in 1326. In 1394 William Pym granted all the lands, rents and services that he had in Dalkey or elsewhere in county Dublin by the law of England in right of his late wife, Margery, to Roger Barry (or Davy?) and his wife, Margery, daughter and heiress of John Dawe and Pym.s late wife. Unfortunately, no details of the Dalkey property were given. The fact that the deed was noted in the Christ Church records suggests strongly that the property was held from the Augustinian Priory and Cathedral of Christ Church or Holy Trinity. The Dawes were a fairly important family in the manor and in the borderlands of the march. The heir of Adam Dawe, who was the king's ward, was returned manor of Shankill. Thus used to pay 2. 3s. 8d. but now paid nothing because the lands were "in malefactors" hands near the Irish.". Adam had been granted the lands in 1304. He probably succeeded his father, also names John. The archbishop was held to have alienated the land to Adam without royal licence. This seems to conflict with the view that the lands were held as pre-conquest church land free of obligations to the crown. The king apparently challenged this contention.

 

The priory of the Holy Trinity is not mentioned in the 1326 extent but it held land in Dalkey and continued to do so into the nineteenth century. Like much else about early Dalkey,

it is unclear when or how the priory acquired its interests. Archbishop Lawrence O'Toole's grants of churches and lands in 1173 did not mention Dalkey nor did the confirmation of Pope Urban111 in 1186. It is not mentioned in John's charter of 1202 in which the pre-Norman grants on the priory were recited. Archbishop Luke collated it to Holy Trinity with other churches and chapels, with all their appurtenances in chapels, lands and tithes, great and small, probably about 1240. This was confirmed by the dean and chapter of St. Patrick's

Cathedral. It was usual for such grants to be confirmed by the chapters of both cathedrals but there may be an implication in this instance that it had been granted originally to St. Patrick's, possibly by Archbishop John Comyn, although there is no record of such a grant in Alen's Register nor in the "Dignitas Decani " of St. Patrick's Cathedral. To complicate matters, about 1220 there was a dispute between St, Patrick's And St. MARY'S Abbey, Dublin, about entitlement to the tithes and benefices of Clonkeen and Dalkey. St. Mary's held neighbouring Bullock and Monkstown (anciently known as Carrickbrennan), St. Patrick's renounced its claims in return for payment of half a silver mark annually by St. Mary's. Archbishop Henry had erected Clonkeen into a prebendal church of St. Patrick's about 1220 and it may be that event that brought the dispute to a head. Later this prebend was transferred to Ballymore and Lusk. How St. Patrick's still had an interest in the 1240's in unknown. Perhaps the archbishop came to an arrangement with St, Mary's and thought it desirable to join St. Patrick's in the transfer so as to remove any risk of it reviving its claims. In any event, by mid-century Christ Church was established in Dalkey and Clonkeen.

 

It is not known what lands originally went with St. Begnet's Church but undoubtedly it had some. In sixteenth century leases lands on both sides of the main street were described as ancient church land. But the priory also obtained lands from others. Thus in 1504 Johanna Waring, widow of Peter Bartholmew of Dublin, granted to Holy Trinity in perpetual alms all her messuages and lands in Dalkey.

 

Another family with interests in Dalkey were the Talbots. In 1218 the Justiciar, Geoffrey de Marisco, who was strongly suspected of corruption by the king, was ordered to send to London for adjudication the details of the case taken by his wife, Eva de Birmingham, against Richard Talbot over four carucates of land in Dalkey. In 1223 the case was decided in favour of Talbot, who had produced a charter from John to his ancestor. In 1224 the archbishop of Dublin, now justiciar, was ordered to put Talbot in possession. A Richard Talbot was returned in 1284 as rendering one goshawk a year to the king for Dalkey and in 1293 he was fined twenty shillings plus half a mark for arrears of the rent. In 1323 the escheator accounted for 13.17.8d. rent of the lands of Richard Talbot at Dalkey in the king's hands because of his death. They were delivered to his son and heir, also Richard John Talbot, lord of Feltrim, quit-claimed a messuage in Dalkey in 1438 to a Thomas White; it had been held by his father, also Thomas. In 1525 an inquisition showed that Robert Talbot of Belgard had land in Dalkey, among other places, but he had acquired it by purchase. It is not clear if this was the messuage and garden that Peter Talbot of Fassaroe held in 1553 of the archbishop and which passed to his son John, who in turn, granted the property to Alderman Richard Fagan of Dublin in 1587. As late as 1687 a Talbot (Henry or Richard) got a grant of virtually all the land of the dean of Christ Church, in Dalkey. The tenure of the Talbots in Dalkey, therefore, is long but confused.

 

The crown appears to have had a continuous interest in the Talbot properties, unlike its interest in the Dawe lands, noted earlier. This certainly challenges the accepted view that the church held all Dalkey from before the Norman conquest. It is possible that the crown lands were elsewhere in the area, Dalkey being used somewhat loosely but in absence of more information one can only pose the question.

 

The only surviving original grant is that of Simon Stakebull and Isabella, his wife, to William Fox of Dalkey in 1382. A Fox was a juror in Shankhill in the mid-thirteenth century, hiding under the Irish form, Roger Synnuche, enquiring into allegations that the archbishop had usurped royal prerogatives. The Stakebulls or Stakepolls were a prominent Dublin merchant family in the fourteenth century. The first dateable entry of one of the family in the Dublin merchant roll is 1228-9 but there is an earlier, undated, entry, John Stakepol was a city bailiff in 1307. He amassed considerable property in the High Street area and died about 1334. His estate was charged with two marks of silver for masses for his soul for thirty years. A Robert Stakebull was mayor in 1378-9. It is possible that Simon was a son and that the Dalkey property had been in the family for some time. It lay between two White holdings, proof of the antiquity of that family in Dalkey. It had been held by a John Crumpe, Robert and Walter Crompe were in the jury that took the extent of the manor in 1326.

 

The Stakebull grant is evidence of the interest of the Dublin merchants in Dalkey. The connection may have started earlier. A Johannes de Dalkey was admitted to the Dublin Guild Merchant in 1244-5. Whether he was a merchant in Dalkey or resident in Dublin is impossible to say. By the late 1500s, however, the Christ Church leases were a roll of the leading citizens of Dublin. Richard FitzSimon, who had property in the town in 1549, was described as a merchant of Dublin. He was the father in law of John FitzSimon, who was mayor in 1567-8. His son, Walter, who succeeded, was also described as a merchant. This family had joined the gentry; they had estates in west county Dublin and in Meath. They had property from the archbishop in Dalkey, which Walter granted in 1589 to Alderman Thomas Gerrot (mayor in 1594-5). Alderman Walter Ball mayor in 1580-1, got a Dalkey lease in 1577. Alderman Richard Fagan, mayor in 1587-8, had a grant of the tithes of Dalkey in 1586 and also secured the lands of Bullock. Alderman James Bee, who had a messuage and four acres when he died in 1626, was almost the James Bea who served as city sheriff in 1605. He was possibly a son or grandson of Alderman Michael Bea, who was mayor in 1568-9 and who held land of the archbishop in Dalkey. John Donegan leased one of the castles in 1585. He was almost certainly the son of Thady Dongan, a fishmonger of Fishamble Street, Dublin. Thady was an alderman in 1547-8. John himself served three terms as alderman, 1571, 1572 and 1588 and one as city sheriff in 1584. He was also second remembrancer of the Irish exchequer. The family was moving into the gentry and became titled as viscount Clane and earl of Limerick in the late seventeenth century but was to lose all, like the Fagans and others, in the Williamite war. It is most unlikely that the Dublin ruling class developed a sudden interest in Dalkey in the sixteenth century. The Stakebull connection suggests otherwise, as does the fact that the Dongans were fish merchants. It is reasonable to assume that in many cases the association between Dublin and Dalkey was much older.

 

The connections of marcher families such as the Dawes, Barnwalls and Talbots with Dalkey have been mentioned. Other local gentry also acquired property in the town, including in the sixteenth century the Aspolls (Archibolds) and the Pippards. But the family that acquired possibly the greatest influence were the Walshes. It was not uncommon for a town to fall under the sway of a local lord. The earl of Ormonde dominated Waterford and the earl of Desmond controlled Dungarvan, Youghal, Cork and Kinsale in the late fifteenth century. As will be seen in the next chapter, the Walshes took control of Dalkey in the fifteenth century or came close to doing so. There were several families of the name in the area but the ones most closely associated with Dalkey were the Walshes of Carrickmines, county Dublin and Killincarrig, county Wicklow. They were perceived as an unruly clan, who seem to have adopted Irish ways. William Walshe, who had a grant of Killiney from Holy Trinity in 1530, was known as McHowell. He may be the William, who got a grant of lands and tithes in the area in 1555, when he was described as son Tybbot Walshe of Carrickmines. The dean eventually had to take legal proceedings to recover the lands. When Henry Walshe of Killincarrig died in 1570 he held extensive possessions in Dalkey of the archbishop and Christ Church, including two castles and several houses. But the inquisition was not taken until 1594, when the jury reported that "tenure of lands had long been concealed from the Queen and her predecessors". His son, Theobold, had taken over. In 1566 William McShane Walshe of Corke (near Bray) was pardoned for having robbed a widow, Gormla `O'Clondowil, in Glencullen. He was alleged to have taken a brass pan, two gallons of butter, three sheep, a night gown, two women's gowns and a cloak. This suggests that she was a lady of some substance and that there was more to the affair than a simple robbery. Several of William's kinsmen and members of other local families, Irish and Old English, were pardoned at the same time for having rescued him from the custody of the sub-sheriff of county Dublin. In 1602 Henry Walsh of Dalkey was pardoned for rebellion.

 

These were the leading people of Dalkey, more than likely absentees. We know very little about who may have actually lived in the town or what they did. The extent of 1326 has little on tenants-at-will, cottagers or betaghs. Alen mentions "divers tenants" in Shankill to whom the demesne lands had been set. He also mentions tenants at will in Dalkey, who held forty acres at sixpence an acre and four cottages, who used to pay four shillings a year for their cottages. It is clear from later leases that the burgesses had under-tenants on their plots. Tenants could also be required to perform their customary labour service in other parts of the manor. There were no recorded betaghs in Dalkey.

 

A John Kendale is mentioned about 1326 as holding land of the prior of Holy Trinity at an annual rent of three shillings, suit of court and tolbal (a tax) of ale as often as he brewed. A person of that name was a juror in the manor of Shankhill in the same year. In 1346 the Bailiff of the priory's manor of Clonkeen bought 200 herrings from a John Kendale (the same or a relation?) for sixteen pence. When St. Mary's Abbey, Dublin, was suppressed in 1539 it held a messuage, close, and ten acres of arable in Dalkey. Most of it was leased to a John Lacy but Anthony Shillingford, Donald MacThomas and Terence Mayne each had a house without land, for which they paid an aggregate eight shillings and eight pence a year over and above the rent of two shillings due to the archbishop. Alderman Walter Ball's lease of 1577 listed his tenants, viz a messuage by the east gate on the south side of the town where John Dowling dwelt with a garden and one acre of arable; a house inhabited by William Doherty with a garden and one stang of land; the house of Dermod Riaughe with two acres and one stang of land; the house of John Owen with a garden and one stang of land, the house of MuirisMcEghy with a garden and two acres of arable; the house of the late James Rochford with a garden; the house of the late Melagh Hoper with a garden; a plot near the priest's garden and north of the churchyard. He was also required to build a house in all the waste places. Henry Walshe's lease of 1565 was equally detailed and may relate to much of the same estate. When James Kennan got his lease of Dongan's land in 1645 (Dongan was involved in the 1641 rebellion) he was required to build two houses within five years.



[History Page]

[Dalkey Home Page]